This is by far the best defense of the Second Amendment you will see and hear! Greensboro City resident Mark Robinson dropped a massive truth bomb on gun rights, to the City Council, during a meeting on whether or not to ban an upcoming gun show. Every word from Robinson is 100% indisputable truth. Without going into detail, in this unprepared speech, Robinson demolished all the gun-grabbing Left’s talking points defending the Second Amendment and law-abiding Americans God-given/natural rights to self-defense.
There are no words, Robinson said it all, from pointing out criminals will NEVER hand over their weapons, the police’s inability to enforce laws already on the books, to government leaders always going after law-abiding Americans, the good guys who are the majority, after a crime or mass shooting! The People are always punished for the actions of one or a few bad apples and it has to stop.
Robinson said it best “come hell or high-water” citizens, not only in Greensboro but coast-to-coast, are going to keep their rights leaders are blatantly infringing upon. Gun grabbing politicians are looking for a fight they are not going to be able to win. The Second Amendment is clear, the Founders intentions are available for anyone to read, they meant what they wrote vs some liberal academic’s reinterpretation of what they said based on today’s use of language.
Case law has already set precedent that these unconstitutional acts and laws are going to be overturned.
“A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.” –Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
“An unconstitutional law is void and is as no law.An offense created by it is not crime.A conviction under it is not merely erroneous but isillegal and voidand cannot be used as a legal cause of imprisonment.” – Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1879)
“An unconstitutional act is not law.It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office.It is,in legal contemplation,as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” – Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” –Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows: The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffectivefor any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law,in legal contemplation,is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” – 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 177
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it. The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute,whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, isin realityno law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW,in legal contemplation,IS AS INOPERATIVE AS IF IT HAD NEVER BEEN PASSED.“ – 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 256